News · SI

Anthropic launches Claude Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2, faster and 20% cheaper

Anthropic has released Claude Fable 5.2 to all users and Claude Mythos 5.2 to vetted security and life sciences organisations. The shared model is up to 30% faster than the 5.1 generation, costs $8 per million input tokens, and leads Anthropic's own tests on agentic coding, robotics and research tasks.

AnthropicClaudeFableMythosLLMAgentsRoboticsCybersecurity

Anthropic's launch graphic reading Claude Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2 above a glowing planetary horizon
Image: Anthropic

Anthropic has released Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2, an upgrade to the models it pitches at "the most daunting technical challenges"[1]. Fable 5.2 is available to all users from today, while Mythos 5.2 is restricted to vetted organisations working in cybersecurity and life sciences[2].

01 / 05

One model, two sets of guardrails

Anthropic says Fable and Mythos are the same underlying model. Fable carries classifiers that block high-risk cyber work such as penetration testing and exploit generation, plus most research biology tasks, and hands blocked queries to an older Opus model instead[1]. Mythos runs without those blocks for organisations approved through the company's Cyber and Life Sciences Verification Programs. Anthropic says Fable 5.2 produced about 55% fewer unnecessary blocks than Fable 5.1 in early testing.

02 / 05

Faster and cheaper

Both models generate output up to 30% faster than the 5.1 versions and cost $8 per million input tokens and $40 per million output tokens[1]. CNBC reports that is 20% less than the previous generation[3]. An optional fast mode, priced at $16 and $80, speeds generation by up to 2.5 times. The models have a 1 million token context window and up to 128K output tokens[2].

03 / 05

What Anthropic says it can do

On Anthropic's own benchmark table, Fable 5.2 scores 49.1% on the FrontierCode 2.0 agentic coding test at its highest effort setting, against 45.5% for Opus 5.5 and 42.8% for OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra[1]. The biggest jump is in robotics: on RoboDojo Sim, which tests control of a simulated two-arm robot from camera images, Fable 5.2 scores 64.9%, up from 27.6% for Fable 5.1. Anthropic also showed physical robots driven by the model solving a puzzle cube and unscrewing a bottle cap.

The launch post lists several prerelease results:

  • A team of about 1,000 Fable 5.2 agents formalised the proof of Fermat's Last Theorem in the Lean language in 30 hours, versus 11 days for Anthropic's earlier attempt.
  • The model solved two open problems in the theoretical physics of black holes, with preprints published.
  • From a one-paragraph prompt it designed three working electronic devices, built with circuit board maker Diode, none of which needed electrical fixes.
  • Mythos 5.2 found 10.2% more known vulnerabilities than Opus 5.5 on Anthropic's internal CVE Rediscovery test.

All of these figures are self-reported by Anthropic.

04 / 05

Safety work

Anthropic says it built new evaluations for behaviours such as sandbox escapes before release, and that external testers including the UK AI Security Institute and METR assessed the model[1]. In an adversarial test built around a deliberately weak sandbox, Mythos 5.2 used credentials placed outside it in 3.1% of scenarios, down from 21% for Mythos 5.1. The company also says it deliberately held back gains in areas that could most directly accelerate AI development, such as accelerator kernel optimisation, where the model performs at about Opus 5.5 level.

05 / 05

Why it matters

The release lands as Anthropic prepares for a closely watched IPO, and it is the company's first frontier launch since chief executive Dario Amodei called for a slower pace of AI development in September[3]. For developers, the practical news is a top-tier agentic model that is faster and cheaper than its predecessor, with a split access model that is becoming Anthropic's template for handling dual-use capabilities.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions.

01

What is the difference between Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2?

They are the same underlying model. Fable 5.2 ships with classifiers that block most high-risk cybersecurity and research biology tasks, so it is available to everyone. Mythos 5.2 drops those blocks and is limited to organisations approved through Anthropic's Cyber and Life Sciences Verification Programs.

02

How much does it cost?

$8 per million input tokens and $40 per million output tokens, with an optional fast mode at $16 and $80 that Anthropic says generates tokens up to 2.5 times faster. CNBC reports that is 20% cheaper than the 5.1 generation.

03

What are the context and output limits?

Anthropic's docs list a 1 million token context window and up to 128K output tokens.

04

Should I switch from Opus 5.5?

Not for everything. Anthropic recommends Opus 5.5 as the daily driver for most coding and knowledge work, and Fable or Mythos for the most ambitious, open-ended technical problems. Fable 5.2 can also act as an advisor or orchestrator for smaller Claude models.

05

Where can I use it?

Fable 5.2 is available on the Claude Platform as claude-fable-5-2 and on Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure.

06

Are the benchmark results independent?

No. The figures come from Anthropic's own announcement and system card, and several, such as RoboDojo Sim and CVE Rediscovery, were run internally.