MiniMax's published numbers put M3.1 Flash at 76.2 on BankerToolBench, 73.7% on the DeepSWE v1.1 coding benchmark, 61.7 on OSWorld 2.0 and 29.6 on Agents' Last Exam, ranking first among Chinese models on those last two computer-use tests[1]. It also reports 82% on the CyberGym vulnerability benchmark[1].
Its comparison table is more mixed than the headline. M3.1 Flash leads Automation-Bench v1.0.6, a test of business workflows across SaaS tools, at 62.8, ahead of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash-1017 at 60.5, Opus 5 at 50.3 and GPT-5.6 Sol at 45.8[1]. But Opus 5 is well ahead on Terminal Bench 4.0 (51.8 against 38.1) and OSWorld 2.0 (70.6 against 61.7), and DeepSeek's latest Flash still beats it on DeepSWE v1.1 (77.0 against 73.7)[1].
Where MiniMax is really competing is price per task. Its Automation-Bench chart has M3.1 Flash scoring between 52.8% and 62.8% depending on reasoning effort, at under five US cents a task. Every other model on the chart scores lower at its top setting, and costs more per task to get there[1]. All of these are MiniMax's own figures and haven't been independently checked.